THE PROBLEM

Programming intelligence
at human cost.

Your festival, your slate, your distribution decisions — deserve better signal

Festival programmers, distributors, and platform partners are drowning in submissions. Quality intelligence — narrative read, audience model, festival fit — is locked behind expensive consultants or absent entirely. PACCS rebuilds that intelligence as a private architecture: explainable, auditable, and accessible.

4,726+
Films PACCS already understands
22
Anchor festivals · Scaling to 200+
7y
Festival programming data
£249/mo
Festival tier vs. £8K/film consulting
FRICTIONS · WHAT WE'RE FIXING

Three structural failures.

FRICTION · 01

Submission fatigue, no triage signal

Festivals receive 10–50× the films they can programme. Reviewer hours don't scale. Without triage, strong submissions in unfamiliar idioms never reach the panel.

FRICTION · 02

Programming intelligence is priced out

Programming-grade analysis runs £5–15K per film through traditional consulting. Independent producers and small distributors can't reach the work that should help them most.

FRICTION · 03

Generic AI is not curation

Off-the-shelf models lack the corpus, the curation logic, and the explainability needed to operate inside a programming pipeline. PACCS is purpose-built.

THE SHIFT

From bottleneck to signal.

PACCS replaces the unscalable parts of programming intelligence — first-pass triage, narrative read, audience and festival modeling — while keeping humans on the override channel for every decision. The system never replaces the programmer; it gives them more of what they're best at.